基于时间序列相似性分析的管道风险评估权重设置方法研究
A Weighting Method for Risk Assessment of Pipelines Based on Similarity Analysis of Time Series
浏览(2395) 下载(4)
- DOI:
- 作者:
- 周剑峰1, 曾静2
ZHOU Jian-feng1, ZHEN Jing2
- 作者单位:
- 1. 广东工业大学机电工程学院, 广东广州 510006;
2. 广州煤气公司, 广东广州 510060
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
- 关键词:
- 天然气管道;风险评估;穆氏模型;权重设置;相似性分析;欧氏距离
natural gas pipeline;risk assessment;Muhlbauer risk assessment model;weight assigning;similarity analysis;Euclidean distance
- 摘要:
- 提出一种权重设置方法,以改善穆氏管道风险评估模型。穆氏模型是一种系统化风险评估方法,但它把导致管道失效的4大类因素都同样赋予100分,因而不能反映不同类型因素对管道风险的不同作用。较好的方法是对不同类别设置不同权重,文章基于风险概念来设置权重,即对与事故后果关系密切的因素类别赋予较大的权重,管道失效因素类别与事故后果的关系通过历史事故统计数据形成的时间序列相似性程度来确定,时间序列的相似性用欧氏距离来衡量。并以美国管道安全办公室(OPS)统计的管道安全数据为例说明了该方法的使用。
This paper proposes a weight assigning method to improve Muhlbauer risk assessment model for pipelines. Muhlbauer model is a systemic pipeline risk analysis method, but it has a deficiency that the four hazard index categories contributing to pipeline failures are equally assigned 100 scores and can not reflect their different importances for pipeline risk. A proper way is to assign weights to the categories. The weights are determined based on the concept of risk in this paper, that is, the category which has a closer relationship with accident consequence is assigned with greater weight. The relationship is measured by the similarity between their corresponding time series created from historical accident statistical data. The similarity is calculated by Euclidean distance. To illustrate the usage of this method, an example of assigning weights to the four categories is proposed based on the data collected by the Office of Pipeline Safety （OPS） of the United States.2010,1(1): 1-4 收稿日期：2009-8-4分类号：TE88作者简介：周剑峰(1970-),男,重庆人,讲师,2008年毕业于华南理工大学,博士,主要从事工业系统优化及控制、过程装备可靠性与系统安全等方面的研究.参考文献：
[1] Bruce D Beighle,Mike P Gloven P E.Risk Assessment-The Competitive Advantage[A] .2nd International Pipeline Conference[C] .ASME,Calgary,Canada,1998.
[2] Brian J Mergelas,David L Atherton,Xiangjie Kong.Risk Management:A Case Study in Operating PCCP[A] .Proceedings of the Pipeline Division Specialty Conference[C] .American Society of Civil Engineers,Cleveland,Ohio,USA,2002.
[3] W K Muhlbauer.Pipeline Risk Management Manual,Second Edition[M] .Gulf Publishing Company,USA,1996.
[4] 王凯全,王宁,张驰,等.城市天然气管道风险特征与肯特法的改进[J] .中国安全科学学报,2008,18(9):152-157.
[5] 周剑峰,陈国华.基于灰色关联度改进的管道相对风险分析方法[J] .石油化工设备,2006,35(4):48-51.
[6] Lars Harms-Ringdahl.Relationships between accident investigations,risk analysis,and safety management[J] .Journal of Hazardous Materials,2004,111(1-3):13-19.
[7] R Agrawal,C Faloutsos,A Swami.Efficient Similarity Search in Sequence Databases[A] .Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Foundations of Data Organization and Algorithms[C] .Springer,USA,1993.
[8] Franky Kin-Pong Chan,Ads Wai-chee Fu,Clement Yu.Haar Wavelets for Efficient Similarity Search of Time-series:With and Without Time Warping[J] .IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2003,15(3):686-705.
[9] Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.Significant Pipeline Incidents[EB/OL] .http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/ reports/safety/SigPSI.html?nocache=2143,2009 / 2009-04-15.
[10] Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.Significant Pipeline Incidents By Cause[EB/OL] .http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/ comm/reports/safety/SigPSIDet_ 1988_2008_U S.html?nocache = 6295# _ ngdistrib,2009/2009-04-15.
[11] Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.Consequences to the Public and the Pipeline industry[EB/OL] ,http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/reports/safety/cpi.html?nocache=2837# _ngdistrib,2009 / 2009-04-15.
[12] M H Fabera,M G.Stewartb.Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities:critical overview and discussion[J] .Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2003,80(2):173-184.
[13] Mrozek J R.Taylor L O.What determines the value of life? A metaanalysis[J] .Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,2002,21 (2):253-270.
[14] Geetha M Waehrer,Xiuwen S Dong,Ted Miller,et al.Costs of occupational injuries in construction in the United States[J] .Accident Analysis and Prevention,2007,39(6):1258-1266.